TEST IMAGE. Waist level finder.

Rolleiflex 3.5F

€1.250,00
Skip to product information
TEST IMAGE. Waist level finder.

Cameras›Medium format camera›No. T-014

1962

Rolleiflex 3.5F

Kept by Mira in Utrecht

▶  Hear Mira tell it, 9 min

TEST DATA. A 1962 Rolleiflex 3.5F, twin lens.

€1.250

In your bag· see the bag
About this one
TEST DATA. A 1962 Rolleiflex 3.5F, the twin lens reflex with the Planar. Six by six on 120 film, twelve frames a roll, and a waist level finder you look down into rather than through.
TEST DATA. Slow photography. Twelve frames, no meter you would trust today, and a mirror image in the finder that takes a week to get used to. The built-in meter is selenium and no longer accurate. Use a handheld one or a phone.
TEST DATA. The 3.5F is the one people mean. Later, better finder, and the Planar rather than the Tessar. This one has its original focusing screen rather than a later brightscreen, which purists prefer and everybody else finds dim. It is worth knowing which you are.
Condition

How it looks

TEST DATA. Leather covering intact with light wear at the corners. Chrome bright. One small dent on the base plate that does not affect the tripod thread. Finder hood clean and folds properly.

How it works

TEST DATA. Shutter fires at all speeds and sounds right at slow ones. Film transport smooth, frame counter resets. Focus is smooth end to end. Both lenses clear, no separation, no fungus. The selenium meter is dead. That is normal for the age and it is not repairable in any practical sense.

Every photograph on this page is of this exact piece.

The facts
Year1962
Made byRollei
Made inWest Germany
Weight1200 g
ObjectNo. T-014
In the box
TEST DATA. Camera and cap. No case, no strap.
The model
The Rolleiflex 3.5F is a 6x6 twin-lens reflex from 1958 with a 75 mm f/3.5 Planar or Xenotar and a coupled meter.
Everything about the Rolleiflex 3.5F

Kept 1974–2026 · 31 objects

Everything Mira passed on

Who kept it

Mira, Utrecht

Mira's cameras

TEST DATA. Thirty-one cameras and two watches, kept in one cabinet in the hallway for fifty years. Mira bought the first one to photograph her children and never stopped.
I kept them where I walked past them. A camera you cannot see is a camera you never use.
In Mira’s own wordsOpens here

TEST DATA. The cabinet was in the hallway, which everybody found strange. Most people keep a collection somewhere out of the way, in a spare room or a cellar, and mine was the first thing you saw when you came through the door. That was deliberate. I wanted to walk past it.

The first one was a Zeiss my father gave me in 1974, the year my eldest was born. He said a photograph is the only thing you can make that is worth more in thirty years than it was on the day, and he was right about that, although he was wrong about almost everything else. I still have the light meter that came with it. That one is not for sale.

I bought the second because the first jammed, and the third because the second was too heavy to carry with a child on my hip. After that there was no reason any more. There was a market on Saturdays where a man sold cameras out of a suitcase, and I went every week for eleven years. He knew what I had and he would keep things back for me. When he died his daughter sent me a box with four of them in it and a note that said he had put them aside.

People ask whether I used them. All of them. Every single one has been through a roll. There are cameras in that cabinet that have photographed three of my children and two of my grandchildren, and a few that only ever went to Zeeland and back, and one that I took to Rome and dropped on the steps at Santa Maria in Trastevere. That one still works. You can see the dent.

What I was never interested in was the boxes. I know that is what makes them worth something, and I know I have cost myself money over fifty years by throwing them away, but a camera in a box is a paperweight. I bought them to use and I used them, and the marks on them are mine.

The hardest part was not deciding to sell. It was deciding not to leave them to the children. They do not want them, and they were too polite to say so for about ten years, and in the end my daughter said it plainly, which I am grateful for. A collection that nobody wants becomes a burden the day after you die.

So I would rather hand them over now and know. That is the whole reason I said yes to this instead of the auction house, who wanted them in lots of eight with no names on anything. I want the person who buys the Rolleiflex to know it went to Rome.

More like this